|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer Intensive Physics
Robert G. Fuller
|
|
Portugal Conference
|
|
March 6, 199826
University of Nebraska - Lincoln
|
|
|
|
|
lost. You can just turn the computer off and start over again. Frequently they lock
the keyboard. They hit a key and nothing happens . The instructor needs to be there
to provide some help for them. It turned out to have been very beneficial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the students had experience with the physics before they saw the mathematics, that
turned out to be a very powerful learning experience for the students.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We did not properly reduce the amount of physics to cover when we asked them to
do all this software. It was too much. It turns out you cannot teach software and the
same amount of physics that you have always taught. When you start putting these
additional things in, like searching the CD-ROM, you have to change the way you
do the physics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are teaching new software as well as new physics concepts, and new
mathematics, you can not just do that what you used to do, you have to modify the
physics you are going to do. You also need to state explicitly what the new
requirements for the course are (See Figure 47). For example at the Universities in
the United States attendance at lectures is an optional activity. Students do not need
to come to a physics lecture. They can read the book. Students cannot miss a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paperless Class. Nothing happens if
the students are not there doing it
themselves. If they have missed the
class they have missed everything!
There are no lecture notes, there are
no data for them to analyze.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|