|
|
|
I am going to describe this course and then at the end I want to tell you why it failed
and now instead of calling in "Paperless Physics" it is called "Computer Intensive
Physics" or "Paper-Lite", L-I-T-E. It means, like low-fat food, a physics course with
just a little bit of paper in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be done electronically. Our vision was to see if that was possible and how that would
change the way we taught physics and the way students learned physics.
I am going to describe this course for you. Fortunately it was part of a bigger project
so we hired an educational psychologist to evaluate the course, to spy on what we
were doing, to write down notes and to interview the students. I did not have to do
the evaluation myself. I only had to try to figure out in this strange way, a way in
which I could not write notes to the students, how could I teach them physics. First,
I will give you a little bit of background of my own experience and then I will try to
show you some photographs and describe what it was like for the students to do this
physics course. There is now a long history of doing research in physics education.
|
|
|
|
Beginning in the 1950's and 60's in the
United States the epistemological roots of
our present work were planted(see Figure 3).
In your proceedings is the summary work of
Joe Redish giving some of these ideas
(Redish, 1994) I no longer see a physics
course as primarily teaching only physics.
Very few students in the physics class ever
become physicists, one percent or less.
|
|
|